Nothobranchius jubbi Wildekamp & Berkenkamp, 1979
&
Nothobranchius cyaneus Seegers, 1981
Last
update 21/12/99
Introductory note
Following Wildekamp's
1986 study of various N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
populations, he came to the conclusion that both species should in fact be
considered as identical. Because N.jubbi
had been described earlier, it should receive priority in the species'
denomination. N.cyaneus Seegers,
1981 should therefore be regarded as a recent junior synonym of N.jubbi
Wildekamp & Berkenlamp,
1979. Since we are not fully convinced of all arguments put forward and since it
is believed that, in this specific case [as opposed to what is observed in N.korthausae,
N.eggersi or in other Nothobranchius
species], there must be much more to it than just polychromatism in males,
both "species" (whatever their status) are herewith presented next to
each other. This would be the first species where both polymorphism [various
body shapes] and polychromatism [various colour forms] would occur next
to each other.
|
|
The aspect of polymorphism has thus far received very
little attention [in Wildekamp's 1986
study, measurements were taken from different size and age groups], besides from
the fact that little is mentioned concerning the sub-species N.jubbi
interruptus. Also the "definition" of intermediary
forms [based in essence on various gradients of the red colour in the caudal
fin] does not appear to be satisfactory; both "species" could in fact
have a red form as observed in many other Nothobranchius
species. In addition, some populations breed really through over several
generations [both in shape and in color] without ever an intermediary form
appearing.
Based on published literature information and on practical
breeding experience with both "species", we tend to favour the idea
that one could either be dealing with species in "creation" or with
two sub-species (as proposed by Seegers,
1985) with very similar intermediary forms. The definition of a species requires
that hybrids be sterile, but what is generally called hybrids or intermediary
forms in this case could in fact correspond to subordinate males of both "species".
Non-red chromatic forms in N.guentheri
and N.foercshi are far less
dominant and far less aggressive than the red morphs. When brought together in
one same tank, non-red forms will always be pushed back and will only
participate to the species' spawning success if and when sufficient space is
made available. Although not investigated thus far, it would appear that in Nothobranchius
the red colour must, in one way or the other, be directly linked to aggressive
and territorial behaviour, and thus to spawning success. In these two species,
the red and non-red forms maintain however an identical body shape, which is
imprinted in the species' specific gene pool. It would thus appear that more
investigation is required in this field - in fish, colours appear also to be
influenced by environmental and relational conditions. What about general body
shapes?
First Description
Terra Typica
Meristic &
Morphometric Data
Table 1: Meristic data of N.jubbi
(after Wildekamp & Berkenkamp,
1979)
[values expressed in % of standard length, averages for the Paratypes]
|
Characteristics |
Holotype |
Average of Paratypes |
|
|
Males |
Females |
||
|
Total length |
44.5 |
- |
- |
|
Body height |
28.6 |
28.6 |
25.4 |
|
Head length |
29.7 |
31.3 |
29.3 |
|
Length caudal peduncle |
22.8 |
20.8 |
24.1 |
|
Height caudal peduncle |
14.2 |
13.9 |
14.4 |
|
Eye diameter |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
|
Inter-orbital width |
13.3 |
13.2 |
11.9 |
|
Snout length |
8.3 |
7.0 |
5.3 |
|
Distance snout tip-dorsal fin origin |
53.6 |
56.7 |
60.0 |
|
Distance snout tip-anal fin origin |
58.9 |
59.0 |
63.1 |
|
Distance snout tip-ventral fin origin |
48.6 |
47.0 |
48.5 |
Table 2: morphometric data of N.jubbi
(after Wildekamp & Berkenkamp,
1979)
|
Characteristics |
Range |
|
Dorsal fin rays |
15 - 16 |
|
Anal fin rays |
16 - 18 |
|
Scales in lateral line series |
29 - 32 |
|
Scales around body in front of ventral fins |
23 - 25 |
According to Wildekamp
(1986), J. J. Scheel (1981 and 1983,
pers. comm. to Wildekamp) carried out
some cytological studies on live specimens of N.cyaneus
from Shalanbod and Sunguni
(blue phenotype), Somalia, and on
specimens of N.jubbi and N.cyaneus,
with intermediary forms, from Azenda Bader,
Somalia. They were compared with
forms of N.jubbi from Malindi,
Kenya, and N.cyaneus
from Warfa (N. sp. Warfa
Blue), Somalia. This disclosed the
close relationship existing between N.cyaneus and N.jubbi.
Both "species" had "identical" karyotypes with 2n= 34
chromosomes. All elements distinctively had 2 arms, and one pair of typically
derived metacentric chromosome. According to Wildekamp
(1986), these karyotypes appeared to be identical to those of N.cyaneus
Warfa and N.jubbi
from Malindi studied previously and
which gave an haploid number of n=17 chromosomes.
Table 3: Meristic data of N.cyaneus
(after Seegers, 1981)
[values expressed in % of standard length, averages are for the 9 Paratypes]
|
Characteristics |
Holotype |
Range |
Paratypes average |
|
Total length |
121.6 |
119.1-126.2 |
122.5 |
|
Body height |
31.9 |
24.8-33.2 |
30.0 |
|
Head length |
34.7 |
31.2-34.9 |
33.2 |
|
Height caudal peduncle |
12.5 |
12.4-14.9 |
13.5 |
|
Eye diameter |
9.4 |
8.3-10.6 |
9.3 |
|
Inter-orbital width |
15.8 |
14.8-18.0 |
16.5 |
|
Snout length |
8.8 |
7.3-10.3 |
8.6 |
|
Distance snout tip-dorsal fin |
60.8 |
60.2-67.8 |
65.3 |
|
Distance snout tip-anal fin |
64.4 |
63.0-68.5 |
66.2 |
|
Distance snout tip-ventral fins |
52.0 |
52.0-55.6 |
54.0 |
Table 4: data as % of head length of N.cyaneus
(after Seegers, 1981)
|
Characteristics |
Holotype |
Range |
Paratypes average |
|
Snout length |
25.4 |
21.2-30.5 |
25.8 |
|
Eye diameter |
27.2 |
25.2-31.3 |
28.0 |
|
Inter-orbital width |
45.6 |
44.3-53.4 |
49.8 |
Table 5: morphometric data of N.cyaneus
(after Seegers, 1981)
|
Characteristics |
Holotype |
Range |
Paratypes average |
|
Dorsal fin rays |
17 |
17-19 |
17.7 |
|
Anal fin rays |
19 |
18-20 |
19.0 |
|
Scales in lateral line series |
29 |
27-30 |
28.6 |
Description
Seegers (1981) decided
to define the new species N.cyaneus
on the basis of a difference in number of rays in the various fins between N.jubbi,
N.interruptus and N.cyaneus
(Table 6).
Table 6: Distinction
between N.jubbi, N.interruptus
and N.cyaneus (Seegers,
1981)
|
Fins |
N.jubbi |
N.interruptus |
N.cyaneus |
|
Dorsal fin |
15-16 |
14-16 |
17-19 |
|
Anal fin |
16-18 |
14-17 |
18-20 |
Additional discriminating factors leading to the description
of the new species included the fact that N.cyaneus
was not as deeply build as N.jubbi,
but did have a rather slender body and that the unpaired fins appeared to be
shorter. In addition males of N.cyaneus
have a blue caudal fin and females present, over the distal part of the body,
dark V-like markings pointing towards the caudal fin. These dark V-like stripes
are also known from certain populations belonging to the N.guentheri
species-group [N.annectens, N.guentheri,
N.rubripinnis, N.palmqvisti
and N.patrizii].
In 1983, the Dutch hobbyist T.
Hannink obtained in a batch of N.cyaneus
originating from Warfa, Somalia,
specimens with red in their tail, which further intensified with the second
generation {KFN, 15(1): 16-17}. The report does however not mention whether the
"slender-body" character also changed towards the "deep-bodied"
N.jubbi morph.
Also, in an article published in 1984, Forstner
(1984) reported on crossbreeding experiments between N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus from the lower Tana
drainage system. The author was not able to discriminate with 100% accuracy
females of both simultaneously caught "species". He then separated the
females according to his own personal feelings and left them with the
corresponding males into a breeding session. Following a 2 weeks breeding period,
the males were exchanged. Many eggs moulted, but many fry hatched as well. From
amongst the 100 fingerlings he obtained, 3 could be identified as intermediary
forms; the rest undoubtedly belonged either to the N.jubbi-type
or to the N.cyaneus-type, which by
further inbreeding remained pure [Wildekamp
(1986) however reports that no further inbreeding with these supposedly hybrids
was reported].
The discovery of intermediary forms in northeastern Kenya
and southern Somalia confirmed scheel's
insights that both species are closely related. In above-mentioned areas,
entirely blue specimens can be found as well as specimens with red spots in
their caudal fins. The more northerly found phenotypes always appeared to be
entirely blue. This equally applies to the southern forms, which can be found
together with N.jubbi. Based on
results of his crossbreeding experiments with N.melanospilus,
Scheel does not exclude a possible close
relationship between N.cyaneus and N.melanospilus
and N.interruptus. By this, N.cyaneus,
and also N.jubbi, could belong to
the N.melanospilus-group.
Research carried out by Wildekamp
(1986) on different local forms has led to a synonymy of the blue form of N.cyaneus
from Gongoni described by Seegers
(1981) with N.jubbi. According to Wildekamp
(1986), both N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
should thus be considered as synonyms, with N.cyaneus
representing a junior synonym of N.jubbi.
N.jubbi was the third species of
the genus, after N.korthausae and N.eggersi
where polymorphism [more correctly polychromatism] was known to have occurred.
Wildekamp (1986)
compared the meristic data of 16 populations of N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus originating from all
over the natural distribution area [Table 7 and Table 6].
Table 7: Range of
measurements of various N.jubbi populations
- Expressed in % of Stand Length (SL)
(after Wildekamp, 1986)
|
Population |
Standard Length [mm] |
Head Length |
Body Depth |
Eye Diameter |
Interorbital Width |
Snout Length |
Predorsal Length |
Prenal Length |
|
1 |
31.8 - 37.7 |
27.1 - 33.6 |
25.0 - 29.5 |
7.1 - 9.1 |
11.5 - 14.5 |
4.4 - 8.2 |
53.6 - 62.3 |
55.5 - 65.8 |
|
2 |
30.5 - 41.3 |
28.2 - 30.9 |
31.9 - 34.5 |
8.8 - 10.5 |
10.1 - 14.5 |
5.2 - 6.9 |
56.9 - 62.6 |
56.2 - 63.9 |
|
3 |
34.0 - 49.6 |
27.4 - 28.6 |
28.6 - 30.0 |
8.3 - 9.1 |
12.4 - 14.1 |
5.6 - 6.9 |
54.4 - 59.4 |
56.3 - 61.8 |
|
4 |
30.7 - 42.9 |
29.7 - 32.1 |
30.9 - 33.2 |
8.1 - 10.7 |
10.3 - 13.1 |
8.1 - 11.5 |
58.2 - 62.6 |
58.5 - 64.7 |
|
5 |
31.0 - 32.9 |
31.2 - 34.9 |
24.8 - 33.2 |
8.3 - 10.6 |
14.8 - 18.0 |
7.3 - 10.3 |
60.2 - 67.8 |
63.0 - 68.5 |
|
6 |
20.2 - 25.3 |
29.8 - 33.7 |
27.5 - 32.7 |
9.2 - 10.9 |
11.5 - 13.4 |
6.0 - 7.5 |
56.0 - 60.4 |
55.0 - 60.9 |
|
7 |
27.3 - 28.8 |
29.7 - 30.6 |
25.7 - 26.0 |
8.0 - 8.1 |
11.0 - 12.5 |
5.5 - 5.9 |
57.3 - 58.2 |
57.3 - 58.2 |
|
8 |
22.4 - 30.0 |
29.7 - 31.3 |
24.7 - 32.2 |
8.3 - 10.0 |
13.3 - 15.6 |
5.9 - 7.6 |
55.7 - 61.7 |
56.4 - 64.7 |
|
9 |
28.4 - 45.9 |
27.2 - 31.3 |
26.9 - 30.2 |
8.7 - 9.9 |
11.9 - 14.2 |
5.8 - 7.2 |
57.7 - 62.0 |
55.8 - 63.9 |
|
10 |
27.7 - 33.2 |
28.0 - 32.5 |
28.5 - 29.0 |
9.0 - 10.1 |
13.3 - 14.8 |
6.3 - 6.9 |
54.2 - 57.8 |
55.7 - 58.8 |
|
11 |
39.7 - 60.4 |
26.4 - 30.7 |
25.5 - 35.0 |
7.8 - 9.5 |
13.1 - 16.7 |
4.8 - 8.0 |
54.2 - 61.3 |
56.1 - 64.0 |
|
12 |
35.1 - 43.2 |
29.1 - 34.4 |
26.5 - 32.7 |
8.2 - 10.1 |
12.4 - 15.6 |
6.1 - 8.0 |
56.3 - 62.4 |
56.1 - 65.8 |
|
13 |
27.4 - 35.7 |
29.0 - 30.5 |
28.4 - 31.0 |
9.0 - 10.2 |
11.2 - 13.2 |
4.8 - 6.8 |
59.6 - 63.1 |
56.4 - 61.3 |
|
14 |
22.9 - 40.0 |
29.7 - 30.0 |
24.5 - 25.3 |
8.8 - 10.9 |
13.1 - 13.8 |
5.7 - 7.5 |
57.6 - 59.8 |
56.8 - 61.5 |
|
15 |
41.3 - 67.9 |
29.0 - 33.3 |
30.0 - 34.0 |
7.9 - 9.2 |
13.9 - 15.2 |
5.3 - 7.8 |
57.4 - 64.6 |
57.1 - 66.2 |
|
16 |
44.7 - 60.4 |
26.6 - 33.8 |
30.0 - 37.9 |
5.9 - 9.7 |
12.1 - 15.9 |
5.2 - 7.6 |
56.0 - 63.9 |
54.5 - 64.6 |
Origin of the studied populations:
1.
Red phenotype - Type material of N.jubbi,
BMNH 1962.7.9:4-14, collector J.H.E. Leaky
[11 specimens]
2.
Red phenotype - Malindi, Kenya, MRAC 79-07-P-156-162, collector E.
Holler [6 specimens]
3.
Red phenotype - North of Malindi, Kenya, collector M.
Forstner & M. Willert [2 specimens]
4.
Red phenotype - Aquarium strain originating from Leaky's
collection [8 specimens]
5.
Blue phenotype - Type material
of N.cyaneus, SMF 16397-16402 and
BMNH 1981.9.30:2-5, collector K.Lung
6.
Blue phenotype - Shalanbod, Somalia, MRAC 84-50-P-25-39, collector R.Wildekamp
& al. [11 specimens]
7.
Blue phenotype - Durbane, Somalia, BMNH 1983.3.14:77-78 and NAS
collection [10 specimens]
8.
Blue phenotype - Dur e Kalin, Somalia, MRAC 84-50-P-11-19 and BMNH
1984.5.9:56-59, [13 specimens]
9.
Blue phenotype - North of Garsen, Kenya, collector M.
Forstner & M. Willert [4 specimens]
10.
Blue phenotype - Dekta, Somalia, MRAC 84-50-P-20-24, collector R.
Wildekamp & Al. [3 specimens]
11.
Blue phenotype - Warfa, Somalia, collector R.
Haas [10 specimens]
12.
Blue phenotype - Haya, Somalia, collector R.
Haas [10 specimens]
13.
Intermed. phenotype - Goba, Somalia, MRAC 84-50-P-1-5, collector R.
Wildekamp & Al. [5 specimens]
14.
Intermed. phenotype - South of Garsen, Kenya, collector M.
Forstner & M. Willert [2 specimens]
15.
Intermed. phenotype - Halima Adai, Somalia, collector R.
Haas [10 specimens]
16.
Intermed. phenotype - Afmadu, Somalia, collector R.
Haas [18 specimens]
Table 8:
Fin ray and scale counts on various N.jubbi
populations - (north south distribution after Wildekamp,
1986)
|
Population |
Dorsal fin rays |
Anal fin rays |
Scale on medio-lateral line |
Nb |
Col. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
X |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
X |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
X |
|||
|
Durbane,Som. |
|
|
5 |
5 |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
7 |
3 |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
29.7 |
10 |
Blue |
|
Hogay, Somal. |
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
4 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
|
17.1 |
|
|
5 |
8 |
3 |
|
29.9 |
16 |
Blue |
|
Warfa, Somalia |
|
1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
17.8 |
|
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
3 |
6 |
3 |
|
30 |
12 |
Blue |
|
Dekta,Somalia |
|
5 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
17.1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
28.8 |
13 |
Blue |
|
Dur e Kalin,So. |
7 |
10 |
15 |
4 |
|
|
16.4 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
11 |
2 |
|
17.1 |
|
4 |
11 |
11 |
9 |
1 |
29.8 |
36 |
Blue |
|
Shalanbod,So. |
|
2 |
10 |
3 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
|
17.5 |
|
|
6 |
5 |
4 |
|
29.9 |
15 |
Blue |
|
Azenda Bader, S |
|
5 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
7 |
3 |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
4 |
4 |
2 |
|
29.8 |
10 |
Inter. |
|
Sunguni, Som. |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
30.5 |
2 |
Blue |
|
Afmadu, Som. |
5 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
16.1 |
|
7 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
16.9 |
|
1 |
5 |
10 |
2 |
|
29.7 |
18 |
Inter. |
|
Haya,Somalia |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
30.7 |
10 |
Blue |
|
Goba, Somalia |
3 |
5 |
9 |
2 |
|
|
16.5 |
|
2 |
5 |
10 |
2 |
|
17.6 |
|
2 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
|
29.8 |
19 |
Inter. |
|
Halima Adai, So. |
1 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
17.5 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
|
28.4 |
10 |
Inter. |
|
Garsen, Kenya |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
18 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
29 |
3 |
Blue |
|
South Garsen, K. |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
18.5 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
28.5 |
2 |
Inter. |
|
N.jubbi Types |
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
30.7 |
11 |
Red |
|
Malindi, Kenya |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
17 |
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
29.8 |
6 |
Red |
|
Aquar. strain, K. |
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
17.5 |
|
1 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
29.5 |
8 |
Red |
Colour description
This species belongs to the mid-sized Nothobranchius
species. In opposition to most other species within the genus, N.cyaneus
can be at times a rather dull to colourless species, other populations display
light blue-green colours. N.cyaneus
can be distinguished from the other Nothobranchius
species by its typical blue caudal fin.
Preserved specimens
Preserved males (in
formalin and kept in alcohol) of N.cyaneus
present a light blue-gray base coloration, over the backside rather brownish.
Each body scale is edged with a red-brown border creating a reticulated pattern
over the body. This pattern covers uniformly the entire body and generates the
impression of a enveloping red-brown shine over the body. Unpaired fins have a
dark gray base coloration on which runs some light gray stripes, creating the
impression of a more or less intensive pattern. The caudal fin has a thin white
marginal hem, a little thicker along the dorsal side. A white marginal band can
also be found in the dorsal fin and often the tips of the anal fin rays are also
white. Ventral fins are dark grey and pectoral fins transparent, often with a
white marginal band (Seegers, 1981).
Preserved females of N.cyaneus
(Seegers, 1981) present a gray-brown
base coloration, more whitish towards the belly and reddish-brown towards the
backside. Here also the scale borders are coloured with a thin red-brownish hem.
Over the posterior part of the body, females display dark V-shape circular bands,
with the tip of the V pointing towards the caudal fin and lying over the
longitudinal line. Unpaired and ventral fins are gray-brown, reddish around
their base and further colourless. Pectoral fins are entirely colourless.
Live specimens
Males: At the time of
the first description of the species in 1979, Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp (1979) wrote that males
from the Leaky [re-discoverer of the
species in 1962] material are easily distinguishable from the other Nothobranchius
species. "Characteristic is a wide, dark gray-blue band in the caudal fin.
In older males a thin white marginal band often follows this zone. The wide
gray-blue band over the normally red caudal fin can in some instances be reduced
or even fail entirely. As at times a large proportion of the males had an
entirely gray-blue caudal fin, Tuner
(1964) spoke of polymorphism [appearance in one and the same species of
specimens with different shapes, it would have been preferable to speak of polychromatism
(=several color forms)]. It was however observed that all the sexually mature
and active males had the red colour in the proximal part of the caudal fin [near
the body], and that it extended into the caudal peduncle" (Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp, 1979).
According to Wildekamp & Berkenkamp
(1979) original description of the species the body colour of N.jubbi
males is gray-blue, the back being darker, the belly lighter to whitish. The
scales are edged by a thin dark border, which creates a reticulated pattern over
the body. The dorsal fin is blue-gray with numerous dark spots, which at times
flow together into irregular stripes. The "dorsal" [it should read in
fact the anal] fin is light gray-blue, with some dark spots in its posterior
part. The caudal peduncle and the anterior part of the caudal fin are red (in
young males blue-gray), following this appears a wide dark gray-blue band (in
older males this band is absent or strongly reduced). The ventral fins are light
bluish, the pectorals are colourless with a light blue edge.
Males of N.jubbi have a red, blue
or an intermediary colour pattern. The various populations, which identified
themselves on the basis of their origin, can easily be identified as N.jubbi
like N.jubbi "blue" from Dur-e-Kalin/Somalia
and N.jubbi "red" from
the neighborhood of Garsen/Kenya.
Pectoral and anal fins are colourless with a light bluish to white marginal
band. The ventral fins have a dark marginal band, which runs along the fin basis.
A similar dark band can be found running along the dorsal fin basis. These bands
run first in patches, later in a series of small spots towards the external end
of the fins. The caudal fin possesses a whitish marginal border and on its base,
two dark to deep red circular bands. Scales have deep red to darker margins.
Instead, live males
of N.cyaneus display a uniform
light bluish green body coloration. The intensity of the blue color can vary
amongst populations. Around the scales one can distinguish a small red-brown
margin. The colour of these margins is less bright than in preserved specimens.
They are partly broader over the posterior part of the body where they form
lateral "chevron"-like markings. These markings are present with most
populations. In the southern populations, the lower part of the head is
generally light bleu, in the lower Uebi Scebeli
populations, light yellowish. The chin region is yellow. The caudal fin is also
bleu-gray with vague darker markings made of small spots, partly also forming
concentric bands. Its border always ranges from light blue to white. Around its
base, one can find, by the northern populations, red spots, which can melt
together into a single band. In populations displaying intermediary
characteristics towards N.jubbi,
red spots can appear within the central part of the caudal fin. Dorsal and anal
fins are similarly coloured as the caudal fin, but intermediary populations
never display any red markings. The white margin in dorsal and caudal fins is
also present in live specimens.
Females:
According to Wildekamp & Berkenkamp
(1979) original description of the species the body colour of N.jubbi
females is light grayish. A thin gray border, appearing at times as spots edges
the scales. All fins are colourless, one exception being the dorsal fin, which
can present at its base a few darker spots.
Females of N.jubbi have a light
blue to light brown body coloration. At the level of the mid-body, on the lower
side there are small dark spots. Over the distal part of the body, run thin dark
vertical stripes. Fins are colourless and finrays in anal and caudal fins are
often slightly golden. Over the operculum there are some reflecting glitter
scales. Scheel studied some of Leaky's
1962 material from Malindi in Kenya
and observed that the females had a small fleshy pouch around the genital
papilla, as can be observed in certain Fundulus
species (Wildekamp et al., 1979).
This structure, which enfolds the first anal fin rays, is in fact to be found in
sexually active females of all cNothobranchius
species. This structure must either play a role in channeling the egg through
the duct formed by the anal fin at the time of spawning (Wildekamp
et al., 1979) or at the level of hardening the egg shell just after
spawning and before release in the soil.
Live female N.cyaneus
present a light fresh gray-brown to gray-yellow body coloration and, on the
posterior part of the body, diffuse gray spots or markings. Fins are colourless
to light yellow. According to Seegers
(1981) the female colour is typical; the body brown can be more yellowish and
the dark V-shape circular markings over the posterior part of the body are well
visible (these chevron-like markings can also be found in certain female N.patrizii
populations).
Synonyms
For N.jubbi:
Nothobranchius neumanni
"Malindi" Leaky,
1962
Nothobranchius spec. "Malindi"
Wildekamp, 1977
Nothobranchius jubbi jubbi Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp, 1979
Nothobranchius cyaneus Seegers,
1981
Nothobranchius spec. "Warfa
Blue" - Somalia.
Nothobranchius jubbi K96/23 - Kenya
For N.cyaneus:
Nothobranchius neumanni,
sensu Goldstein (1972)
Nothobranchius spec. "Warfa-blue",
sensu Haas (1981)
The discovery of several Nothobranchius
populations in northeastern Kenya and
southern Somalia, consisting of males,
some of which could be related to N.jubbi,
others to N.cyaneus, was initially
explained as polymorphism or polychromatism (Turner,
1964; Goldstein, 1972), later it was
explained as the result of an hybridisation between two distinct species living
in synpatry (Seegers, 1981 & 1985; Willert
1984). Most of these populations also include males displaying a colour pattern
intermediary to N.jubbi and N.cyaneus,
the size of the red spot on the caudal fin, ranging from a minuscule dot to an
almost entirely red caudal fin, edged with blue-gray (Wildekamp,
1986). In 1985, Seegers (1985)
considered that the blue morph would constitute a sub-species of N.jubbi,
namely N.jubbi cyaneus,
distinguishing itself from the red N.jubbi jubbi
form by a slimmer body shape and higher counts in rays in the unpaired fins and
scales.
As mentioned by Wildekamp
(1986), it is obvious that in cases where polychromatism is present, the
use of colour patterns as discriminating factors between Nothobranchius
species, as advocated by Jubb (1969
& 1975), is of less practical use.
Wildekamp (1986)
reports results of crossbreeding experiments with the "intermediary"
populations of Azenda Bader
[Figure 1] and Goba A,
Somalia. He mentions that "F-1
specimens resembled their parents with the colour pattern of the caudal fin
ranging from entirely blue as in the N.cyaneus
phenotype to almost entirely red as in the N.jubbi
phenotype. Intermediary colour types, with red spots of different sizes, were in
majority. Similar results were obtained in successive generations of the Goba
A population. All sorts of
intermediary colour specimens were present and produced viable offspring's".
Although dealing with the polychromatic aspect, above observation does
not mention the polymorphic variability, which also must have been
present if N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
were to form one single species.
Apparently, one type of experiments is missing [or is still
unknown to me]: crossbreeding of specimens belonging to different and
not-intermediary populations such as the slender Somalia
N.cyaneus Warfa
blue population with deep-bodied and red N.jubbi specimens from Kenya.
In case N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
would form one single and the same species, one should be able to re-create the
entire range of observed intermediary forms [both the colour intermediaries as
well as the morph intermediaries].
According to Wildekamp
(1986), N.jubbi is one of the
larger species belonging to the N.orthonotus
(Peters, 1844) group. Its' close
relatives are N.melanospilus, N.guentheri,
N.jubbi interruptus and N.elongatus.
It distinguishes itself from these close relatives by a deeper body height, the
position of dorsal and anal fins and its colour pattern in both sexes. Females
of N.jubbi present irregular
grayish marks over the body, reminding of the transversal V-shape bars in males.
In the N.orthonotus group, body
markings in females are common in several species; the body markings in N.jubbi
closely resemble those observed in N.guentheri
females, which are considered to form its' closed relatives (Wildekamp,
1986).
Availability in the
hobby
Populations still in the hobby between 1996 -1999 are few and
very uncommon; they include N.jubbi
[or N.cyaneus] "Warfa"
blue and N.jubbi "K96/23"
[collected and introduced in the hobby by Seegers].
All efforts should therefore be made to secure a wider availability of these
species.
Behaviour
Wildekamp (1986)
mentions that N.jubbi from Goba
"A" showed, both in its
natural environment and in a confined environment, a peculiar behaviour. When
frightened: they jumped out of the water. This behaviour is quite unique in the Nothobranchius
world as nearly in all species, when scared, the fish swims towards the bottom
and even hide in it. Although less marked, the F-1 generation also displayed
this behaviour.
Holotype
For N.jubbi:
Adult male with a total length of 44.5 mm and a standard
length of 36.0 mm, collected by J. H. E. Leaky
in July 1962 in a pool along the road to Garsen,
17 miles north of Malindi on the
Kenyan coastal lowlands. British Museum (Natural History) London [BMNH 1962-7-9;
4]
For N.cyaneus:
The type material for N.cyaneus
is kept in the Forschungsinstitut und Museum Senckenberg in Frankfurt and in the
British Museum (Natural History) in London.
Male of 40.0 mm total and 32.9 mm standard length; collected
by K. Lung in August 1980 between Malindi
and Garsen, 4 km beyond the village
of Gongoni. SMF 163-97.
Allotype
Male of 31.2-mm total and 25.3-mm standard length collected
with the Holotype SMF 163-98.
Paratypes
For N.jubbi:
For N.cyaneus:
Size
Aquarium males can reach a total length of about 80-mm;
females remain some 10-mm smaller.
Code
JUB
CYA
Distribution &
Habitat
In 1986, Wildekamp
proposed that N.cyaneus be
considered as a junior synonym of N.jubbi.
He published a list of localities from where N.jubbi
specimens were collected in southern Somalia
and northern Kenya (Wildekamp,
1986) [Table 9]. These localities are indicated in Figure 1
Table 9: List of known
localities of N.jubbi in Somalia
and Kenya (after Wildekamp,
1986)
|
Locality |
Collector |
Date |
Phenotype |
|
|
Somalia |
||||
|
1 |
Durbane, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 59'N - 44° 19' E] |
Awais Isaq/Ali Ibrahim |
XI - 1982 |
Blue |
|
2 |
Durbane, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 59'N - 44° 19' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
3 |
Bur Eibi (Heibi), Bur Acaba distr. [02° 59' N - 44° 18' E] |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Blue |
|
4 |
Kaisany, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 59' N - 44° 18' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
5 |
Hogay, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 54' N - 44° 14' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
6 |
Warfa, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 54' N - 44° 13' E] |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Blue |
|
7 |
Warfa, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 54' N - 44° 13' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
8 |
Dekta, Bur Acaba distr. [02° 54' N - 44° 12' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
9 |
Dur e Kalin (Dur Ana Qalin), Baidoa distr. |
Jawa Kho (NAS) |
VIII - 1979 |
Blue |
|
10 |
Dur e Kalin (Dur Ana Qalin), Baidoa distr. |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
11 |
Genale (Jenale), Coriole distr. [01° 48' N - 44° 42' E] |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Blue |
|
12 |
Coriole, Coriole distr. [01° 46' N - 44° 33' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
13 |
Shalanbod, Merka distr. [01° 43' N - 44° 39' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
14 |
Azenda Bader, Giamama distr. [00° 14' N - 42° 46' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
15 |
Sunguni, Giamama distr. [00° 01' N - 42° 40' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
16 |
Afmadu, Afmadu distr. [00° 31' N - 42° 04' E] |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Intermed. |
|
17 |
Haya, between Hokani (Belesc Cogani) and
Afmadu |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Blue |
|
18 |
Goba A (Golba), Kisimayo distr. [± 00° 42' S - 41° 52' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
19 |
Goba B (Golba), Kisimayo distr. [± 00° 43' S - 41° 50' E] |
Wildekamp/Ali Ibrahim |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
20 |
Halima Adai, between Kisimayo and Badada |
Dr. R. Haas |
I - 1979 |
Intermed. |
|
Kenya |
||||
|
21 |
53-km north of Garsen [± 01° 50' S - 40° 04' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
22 |
54-km north of Garsen [± 01° 49' S - 40° 04' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
23 |
87-km north of Malindi [± 02° 24' S - 40° 07' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
24 |
Golbanti, Tana River delta [± 02° 27' S - 40° 12' E] |
P. J. P. Whitehead |
VIII 1965 |
? |
|
25 |
22-km south of Garsen [± 02° 28' S - 40° 07' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
26 |
50-km north of Malindi [± 02° 45' S - 40° 08' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
27 |
30-km north of Malindi, near Ras Kitua |
E. Holler |
VIII - 1978 |
Red |
|
28 |
45-km north of Malindi, [± 02° 47' S - 40° 08' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Intermed. |
|
29 |
25 miles north of Malindi on the road to
Garsen |
J. H. E. Leaky |
VII - 1962 |
Intermed. |
|
30 |
17 miles north of Malindi on the road to
Garsen |
J. H. E. Leaky |
VII - 1962 |
Intermed. |
|
31 |
Gongoni, north of Malindi, [± 03° 02' S - 40° 08' E] |
K. Lung |
VIII - 1980 |
Blue |
|
32 |
Gongoni, north of Malindi, [± 03° 02' S - 40° 08' E] |
Forstner/Willert |
VI - 1983 |
Blue |
|
33 |
Behind Malindi's Golf course [± 03° 11' S - 40° 06' E] |
E. Holler |
VIII - 1978 |
Red |
|
|
|
Figure
1: Map of collecting sites of N.jubbi
in Somalia and Kenya
[after Wildekamp, 1986] |
A reminder of the collecting sites of Nothobranchius
species in Kenya is given in Figure
2.
|
|
|
Figure 2: Nothobranchius collected in Kenya |
|
|
|
Figure 3: Nothobranchius collected in Somalia |
For N.jubbi:
The distribution area of N.jubbi
species can be brought back to temporary pools in coastal lowland areas of
northeastern Kenya and in pools in
southern Somalia.
For N.cyaneus:
Lung collected the
type specimens of N.cyaneus in
eastern Kenya, "about 20-km
after Malindi towards Garsen,
comes the village of Gongoni, about
4-km after Gongoni, on the right side
of the road in a 10x5 m large, 30-cm deep isolated pool. There is no river in
the vicinity".
Somalia
In Somalia, N.cyaneus
can be found in temporary pools, swamps and road ditches belonging to the lower Uebi
Scebeli and lower Juba
River systems and within the drainage system of the lower Tana
and Sabaki rivers in northeastern Kenya.
Apart from the collection localities known from these river systems, some more
or less isolated populations have also been found in dryer continental locations
in mid-eastern Somalia. According to Wildekamp
(1984), the isolation of these inland populations must have happened rather
recently on the historical time scale as no important genetic shifts have thus
far occurred between them. Most likely because all these isolated populations
and localities are to be found in areas belonging to ancient rivers or wadi's,
geological sings of more humid times. The most recent of which occurred in 1996
and 1998 when large areas in southern Somalia
and northern Kenya experienced severe
floods.
In southern Somalia,
between the monoliths and cities of Bur Acaba
and Bur Eibi, Wildekamp
(1984) discovered N.cyaneus
in several "whar's" belonging to the intermediary villages. He
inspected the "whar's" of Dekta
[Sampling site n° 1], Warfa [S-2], Hogay
[S-3], Kaisany [S-4] and Durbane
[S-5]. All these localities harboured a similar Nothobranchius
ichthyofauna namely: N.microlepis
and N.cyaneus, of which N.species
"Warfa blue" was a
synonym. N.microlepis always
appeared to be superior in numbers, with a slight preference for the deeper
parts, but this was certainly not the rule. In each locality the water was very
turbid, ranging from grayish to rusty-brown, depending on the local soil
composition. The total water hardness varied between 5 and 15 DH, the
carbonate-hardness between 4 and 6 DH, the acidity had an almost neutral pH
value of 6.3-8.3. At the measured high water temperatures [always around 30°
C], the dissolved oxygen content was evidently rather low with values ranging
between 3 and 5.5 mg/l. The highest DH and pH values were recorded at Hogay,
a "whar", which at the time of the visit, had almost dried up. As
accompanying species Wildekamp
consistently found Protopterus amphibius
(Peeters, 1844), some frogs, water
insects, numerous freshwater crabs and waterscorpions (Wildekamp,
1984).
At the foot of the Dur e Kalin
[meaning silver hill] [S-6] monolith, south-east of Baidoa,
in the middle of a flat and dry bushy country and only reachable through a long
tall and dusty path of which the last part had to be made on foot, Wildekamp
discovered a series of pools partly covered with a layer of duck-weed. All the
pools contained a particularly beautiful, but rather very isolated population of
N.cyaneus as well as freshwater
crabs and tadpoles (Wildekamp, 1984).
The region of the lower Uebi
Scebeli River, roughly between Afgoi
and Merka, covers a flat area,
separated from the ocean by a belt of sand dunes. Collecting Nothobranchius
in this region is far less easy than in the northern area around the monoliths.
Most often the open water can only be reached after crossing dense thorny bushes
or marshy shores, and, once the open water reached, the scoopnet can only be
moved around with great difficulty because of dense watervegetation (mainly
consisting of waterlilies, Nymphea zanzibarensis)
(Wildekamp, 1984).
Close to Shalanbod,
in two road ditches [S-7 and S-8] along the road to Genale,
Wildekamp discovered half-grown N.cyaneus.
In contrast to previously discovered populations, these ones showed duller
colours, the throat area was more yellowish, the fins showed less markings and
the caudal fin presented a larger white marginal border. In the same waters, he
also discovered some young specimens of N.patrizii
who's males started to colour-out (Wildekamp,
1984).
On the road to Genale,
in a swamp and also on both sides of an irrigation canal, which had not yet been
infested with the Cichlid Oreochromis spilurus,
Wildekamp discovered some very pretty N.patrizii
specimens. Close to Corriole, he
found N.cyaneus and N.patrizii
living "syntopically" (= living together in the same habitat) in two
locations [S-10 and S-11]. In the lower Uebi
Scebeli River
system, the water hardness ranged between 19 and 31° DH (total hardness) and
between 4 and 14 DH carbonate hardness. The acid level was always above pH 7.5
whilst the oxygen content was rather low, as would be expected from a marshy
environment: 1.2 to 3.2 mg/l with rather high water temperatures, between 28°
and 33° C (Wildekamp,
1984).
In the area of the lower Juba
River system, the monsoon influence
becomes again more apparent at the level of Buale.
Various fishing trials were carried out along the road from Gelib
over Giamana to Kismayo,
which all produced a similar picture: N.patrizii
and N.cyaneus, interchanging with Clarias
and lungfishes (Wildekamp, 1984).
In the vicinity of Azenda
Bader, Wildekamp discovered
that several males of the there living N.cyaneus
population displayed a red spot on the caudal fin [S-13], reminding him of N.jubbi
Wildekamp & Berkenkamp,
1979. Near Sunguni, in a swamp like
ditch [S-14] in the system of the lower Juba,
more N.cyaneus and N.patrizii
were collected. More to the south of the Juba
river mouth, at the level and just
before entering the settlement of Goba
[= Golba] [S-15], Wildekamp
again discovered a N.cyaneus
population displaying red spots in the caudal fin. With one specimen, this was
even so obvious that initially he thought to have captured N.jubbi.
In the same locality, one could also find a N.patrizii
population, body very dark and large spots on dorsal and anal fins. Noteworthy
was also the presence of a dark band in the caudal fin (Wildekamp,
1984).
Past the village of Goba
[S-16], where the road was also flooded, Wildekamp
discovered, beside N.cyaneus "red-in-the-tail"
a N.microlepis related species [=
tiny scales and females with prolonged first anal fin rays] "N.spec.affinis
microlepis Goba
B" (Wildekamp, 1984).
Kenya
In northeastern Kenya,
N.cyaneus can be found in temporary
pools, swamps and road ditches belonging to the lower Tana
and Sabaki rivers.
In June 1962, a fish was improrted into the USA under the name
N.neumanni. J.H.E.
Leaky, the son of the reknown Kenyan anthropologist Dr M.
D. Leaky, had found this fish in a pool with standing trees, 17 miles
north of Malindi, along the road
towards Garsen. In June, the pool was
covered with water lilies and algae and was bordered with reed. At a following
visit in December, the pool had already dried-up. Ten specimens of this
collection were send to the British Museum (Natural History) where they were
registered as N.neumanni (Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp, 1979). Various
aquariologists questioned the denomination of this import and the then unknown
species was re-labeled N.spec.
"Malindi". Later this Malindi
species from the Kenyan coastal plains was designated as Nothobranchius
jubbi and had thus nothing to do with N.neumanni
from the Tanzanian central highlands.
It is only after Goldstein's
publication in 1972 of excerpt from letters between Leaky
and Turner that it appeared that this
pseudo-N.neumanni had been caught
in different locations. In his 1982 publication, Wildekamp
(1982) mentioned that Leaky had also
collected in a second very similar pool, 8 miles further north and that he again
captured this pseudo-N.neumanni
species. Wildekamp (1982) further
unravelled that amongst Leaky's fish,
which entered the USA on July 4th 1962, were specimens with a blue
caudal fin and others with a red caudal fin. From this observation, Turner
proposed the idea of polymorphism.
In August 1978, E. Holler
collected similar material in two locations north of Malindi,
Kenya. The first locality was
situated just behind Malindi's golf
course, the second about 30-km more north on the right hand side of the road to Garsen
near Ras Kitua
in the southern part of the Tana
delta (Wildekamp & Berkenkamp,
1979). These collections yieled however only fish with a red caudal fin.
In August 1980, K. Lung
managed to re-collect near Gongoni,
north of Malindi, Kenya,
the form with the blue caudal fin which would bee described one year later, in
1981, by Seegers as N.cyaneus.
In 1968, P. Nagy
collected a species with similarities to N.spec.
"Malindi". This fish was
collected from a swampy area around Kikambala,
somewhat 15-km north of Mombasa, Kenya.
The collector's location gave Kikambala
at 45-km north of Mombasa, however
topographical maps and Holler's notes
confirmed the location of Kikambala
at 15-km north of Malindi. Nagy
provided several specimens of his collection to the Koninklijk Museum van Midden
Afrika [KMMA] in Tervuren, Belgium, and to the Zoologische Staatssammlung München
[ZSM]. Wildekamp & Berkenkamp
(1979) assumed that possibly an aquarium population was also established under
the codename Nothobranchius spec
"U-6", one of them having become part of the KMMA collection. These Nagy
Kikambala specimens where later
described as Nothobranchius jubbi
interruptus by Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp (1979).
In northern Kenya, Willert
and Langnickel collected N.jubbi
in 1985 in a residual pool of a small stream flowing to the lower Tana
River. The locality is given
as 1-km from the road junction between the road to Mnanzini
and the Garsen to Garissa
road, in the direction of Mnanzini"
{01°59' S-40°08' E}. The species lives there syntopic with N.willerti
{= spec. "Mnanzini"}
and N.patrizii.
Four Nothobranchius
species are presently known from the lower Tana
river system in the coastal plains of north-eastern Kenya.:
N.jubbi Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp, 1979, the most widely
distributed species; N.patrizii (Vinciguerra,
1927), N.microlepis (Vinciguerra,
1897), only known from three localities which have been studied by Wildekamp
& Haas (1992), and N.willerti
which was discovered in the early eighties by Willert
& Langnickel. In general, N.jubbi
is found living in synpatry [=together] with one of the above mentioned three
species.
|
|
|
figure 5: Distribution map of N.cyaneus in Kenya {after Willert, 1986} |
In July 1985, during a collecting trip in Kenya,
which led Willert and Langnickel
towards the north, from Mombassa via Malindi
and Garsen, they drove along the Tana
River, on their way to Garissa.
The wood-like terrain gradually changed from a bushy- into a sandy-Savannah.
During the entire trip no single Nothobranchius
could be netted, not even at an, already in 1983 known, collecting site for N.microlepis
{between garsen and Hola}.
All pools along the road had already dried out during this late season period.
In Garissa Willert
and langnickel gave up their courage and
began the return trip to Mombassa.
Because no remnant waters could be found on the onward journey,
they tried to reach closer to the Tana River,
in order to try their luck in remaining marshes and inundated areas. Twice this
didn't produce any result. By the third trial to reach closer to the river (the
road to Mnanzini), the road led over
a small brook where once again they threw out their nets. At last and for the
first time on their long journey towards the north, a Nothobranchius
of about 2-3 cm length was netted. After some hours the catch yielded 3 males
and 6 females. In the same brook two other syntopically living Nothobranchius
species appeared: N.patrizii and N.jubbi.
Some 30 Nothobranchius specimens were caught in this particular
habitat. During the return journey to Mombassa,
close to the Tana River, they always
could find inundated grasslands where, almost always, some Nothobranchius
could be found, namely N.patrizii
and N.jubbi.
Wildekamp (1982)
further observed that the species N.elongatus,
N.jubbi and N.interruptus
could be considered as "bordering species" in Huber's
sense (1980); forming a transitional group of species between, on the one hand,
the N.melanospilus-N.palmqvisti
species-group inhabiting the Kenyan southeastern [south of the Ramisi
River] and Tanzanian northeastern
coastal lowlands [Tanga & Pangani]
and, on the other hand, the N.cyaneus
and N.jubbi species-group
inhabiting the northern Kenyan and Somalian coastal lowlands and forming a
counter-group of possibly "bleu" species, related or equal to N.cyaneus,
with a large distribution area in southern Somalia.
N.jubbi and N.interruptus
seem to occupy an intermediary position between both coastal lowland
species-groups [the Kenyan/Tanzanian N.melanospilus-N.palmqvisti
on the one hand and the Somalian N.cyaneus
on the other hand]. N.jubbi has
indeed a same number of chromosomes as N.cyaneus
[both with n=17] and N.elongatus
and N.melanospilus have n=19. The
position occupied by N.interruptus
is however still unknown.
History
Initially, both N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
where identified as distinct and separate species (Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp, 1979; Seegers,
1981). However, the discovery in the late seventies early eighties, in northern Kenya
and southern Somalia, of several
populations, some of which presented specimens displaying all intermediary color
patterns and forms between both species, linkable to both N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus, created an
unsatisfactory taxonomic situation. Wildekamp
resolved this confusing situation in 1986 by placing them in synonymy (Wildekamp,
1986). Both species are still recognised as very closely related and were
described from collecting sites laying in each other vicinity near Gongoni,
some 25-km north of Malindi, eastern Kenya.
Although some Nothobranchius
from Kenya, dating back to 1892, had
been preserved in the British Museum (Natural History) in London,
one had to wait until 1962 to obtain a first larger fish collection from J.
H. E. Leaky. The type material of N.jubbi
originates from a batch of aquarium fish, send by Leaky
to the U.S.A. He had collected the fish from a temporary pool along the road
from Malindi to Garsen.
Leaky and B.
J. Turner thought these fish belonged to N.neumanni
(Hilgendorf, 1905) and distributed them
as such (Wildekamp, 1979, 1986). Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp (1979) recognised this
and, based on the study of the type material of N.neumanni
(Hilgendorf, 1905) and from a study of Neumann's
trip report, a more precise identification of the original Type locality of N.neumanni
in central Tanzania could be
established. Following this first identification correction, Wildekamp
& Berkenkamp described this
red-tailed fish as N.jubbi in 1979.
In a correspondence over Leaky's
collection with ichthyologist B. J. Turner,
which was made public in 1972 by Goldstein,
it became clear that the as N.neumanni
in the hobby erroneously distributed fish, originated from two collecting sites.
One collecting site was "17 miles north of Malindi,
along the road to Garsen (Kenya)"
and the second site produced "also 7 specimens (larger) of the same species
from a similar pool, somewhat 8 miles further north" (Seegers,
1981). This correspondence further mentions that in the original import, there
were many specimens with a uniformly blue caudal fin and only a few with a large
red spot in the caudal fin. On this basis Turner
(1964) concluded that the species was polymorphic, implying that the
species could have different external colour forms, in this case blue- and
red-tailed male specimens. Over the years, the entirely blue form seems to have
disappeared from the hobby as only the red form seemingly attracted the
hobbyists. On the other hand, if one had a real polymorphic species, as
proposed by Turner in 1964, one would
always, on genetic grounds, find sooner or later, a certain percentage of
differently coloured specimens in a large amount of offspring's.
Subsequent to Leaky's
collection, two other imports from Kenya
arrived in Europe and the USA. In 1968 Nagy
collected near Kikambala, about 15 km
north of Mombasa. Another import made
by Walpole originated from northwest of Mombasa.
According to Wildekamp & Berkenkamp
(1979) it is probable that amongst these imports there was a fish which got
described as N. jubbi
interruptus.
In August 1978, a fresh visit by Holler
to the initial discovery site north of Malindi,
Kenya yielded only the red phenotype.
He also brought back the true N.palmqvisti
from Mrima, N.melanospilus,
N.jubbi interruptus and N.elongatus.
In August 1980, K. Lung,
a German hobbyist, collected the type material of the other related species, N.cyaneus,
during a collecting trip to eastern Kenya.
All males from his population presented an entirely blue colour pattern and were
recognized as Turner's blue phenotype of
1964 (Seegers, 1981, Lung
& Seegers, 1981). During this trip K.
Lung also undoubtedly collected N.jubbi
interruptus near Kikambala,
about 25 km north of Mombasa. The
collecting site for the second species is given by Lung
as "about 20-km after Malindi
towards Garsen, comes the village of Gongoni,
about 4-km after Gongoni, on the
rightside of the road in a 10x5 m large, 30-cm deep isolated pool. There is no
river in the vicinity", eastern Kenya.
The Lung location closely resembles the Leaky
collection site; both must either be identical or occurr in each other's
vicinity. The blue phenotype collected by Lung
in 1980 did not live syntopic with the red-form as previously thought. The
entire population only comprised blue forms. LUNG
provided Seegers with material for
further research and it appeared that also in following generations this blue
phenotype remained stable.
Much to people's surprise, Lung
thus re-discovered the blue phenotype under its pure form. In 1981, Seegers
described this blue phenotype as N.cyaneus.
Seegers (1981) differentiated N.cyaneus
and N.jubbi not only on the basis
of their tailfin colour, but also found a slimmer bodyshape, higher counts in
number of fin rays in both dorsal and anal fins and a smaler dorsal and anal fin
in N.cyaneus. Also the fact that,
worldwide in the hobby, N.jubbi had
already reproduced for over 20 years according to a single pure red-tailed
lineage, and that N.cyaneus had
produced two pure blue lineages, constituted sufficient grounds for Seegers
(1981) to recognize in these species two, genetically distinct, sympatrically
living species (Wildekamp, 1986).
Dr. R. Haas, on a
World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) assignment, collected additional material
originating from mid-eastern Somalia
in January 1979. These specimens could be linked to N.cyaneus
and originated from Warfa, in the
middle Uebi Scebeli
River drainage system, Somalia.
This population was introduced into the hobby as N.sp.
"Warfa blue" (Haas,
1982, Foersch, 1981). The very close
similarity of this fish with N.cyaneus
was pointed out by Wildekamp (1982), who
considered it to belong to N.cyaneus
in 1983 and 1984 (Wildekamp, 1986). The
resemblance between N.cyaneus and
the "Warfa-blue"-form from Somalia
remains striking. The latter form presents a somewhat slimier body but can
produce offsprings with a red colour in their caudal fin base, which tend to
indicate a possible relationship with N.jubbi.
Haas (1982) collected
in January-February 1979 N.microlepis
and the then undescribed N. spec.
"Warfa-Blue" [first
described as N.cyaneus, presently
considered as a junior synonym of N.jubbi]
in a large depression ["War"] holding rainwater. The location was some
180-km north-west of Mogadishu, near
the village named Warfa in the bush,
some 18-km East of a large monolith called Bur
Hacaba on the road from Mogadishu
to the town of Baidoa. In this area,
over 150-km away from any river or other permanent water body, rainwater is
collected in large depressions, which have been enlarged by local residents to
collect rainwater. These "Wars", in contrast to the more southerly
situated roadside ditches where N.patrizii
were collected by Haas (1982), were
completely without any aquatic vegetation. The water in these "Wars"
was completely opaque with a very reddish cast. The bottom consisted in red clay
and the water temperature ranged between 26.5 and 31°C [80-88 °F], the pH was
around 7.8, and the dGH 36-39. Haas
(1982) was informed that most "Wars", except in very dry years, are
more or less dry for no more than two months and that most have had deep wells
dug in their centres where water remains available in very dry periods.
Haas (1982) reports
that N.patrizii, N.microlepis
and N.cyaneus "Warfa-Blue"
were brought to the United States in 1979, as eggs collected with the mud from
their temporary ponds.
Dr. R. Haas has
provided Wildekamp with specimens from
his personnal collection and with fieldnotes on collecting sites from where he
did collect Nothobranchius species.
Haas found N.cyaneus
near Genale, Bur
Heibi and Haya,
as well as mixed populations of N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus near Afmadu
and Halima Adai
(Wildekamp, 1986).
A subsequent expedition to Kenya
by M. Forstner
and Manfred and Brigitte
Willert in June and July 1983, showed
that N.cyaneus presented a vast
distribution area in north-eastern Kenya,
while N.jubbi had on the contrary a
distribution restricted to the lower Galana
and Tana river systems in
north-eastern Kenya.
Their base of operations was Mombasa.
From here, different collecting trips were organised. On the first collecting
journey they drove northwards and collected N.interruptus
near Kikambala [same
locality as Lung]. Near Kaloleni
however they could not find N.elongatus.
In the direction of the south towards the Tanzanian border they collected a 6-cm
long N.palmqvisti male. Afterwards
they moved once again northwards towards the drainage system of the Tana
River. Past Malindi, about 3 km after
the village of Gongoni, they
collected in a pool N.cyaneus {air
temperature 23.5°C, water temperature 27.3°C.}. 22 km before Garsen,
in a sort of flooded grassland with a water temperature of 29°C°, they
captured N.cyaneus and N.jubbi
together in the same pool. 53-km north of Garsen,
in the direction of Garissa, N.cyaneus
was captured together with N.microlepis.
Somewhat further north, it became too dry and no suitable biotopes could be
found. In all, between Malindi and Garissa
they collected N.jubbi and N.cyaneus
in eight different localities: in four of these localities only blue phenotypes,
corresponding to N.cyaneus, were
found. In the four other localities, the population was composed of a mixture of
blue and red phenotypes, but also specimens representing all intermediary forms
in the red colour pattern of the caudal fin. Willert
(1984) identified these populations as belonging to N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus,
whilst the
intermediary forms were recognised as hybrids. On the
return trip to Mombasa, 45-km north
of Malindi, they captured once again N.cyaneus
and N.jubbi together in the same
pool, but also specimens, which looked like crossings between both species.
Strangely N.patrizii was also
discovered in the same pool, which had until then a distribution extending far
more to the north, in Somalia (Wildekamp,
1986).
In the most southern part of eastern Somalia
and in the lower Tana river system,
populations were discovered which resembled both N.jubbi
and N.cyaneus, but also specimens
which displayed all possible intermediary colour gradations between both types.
This phenomenon had been declared on several occasions as a sympatric
co-habitation of two different species, in which the intermediary forms could
then be declared as hybrids. These hybrids should then be sterile in order to
guarantee the survival of the real bio-species. The thought of polymorphism - as
proposed by Turner in 1964 - had been
generally dismissed. Because of this, a taxonomic un-satifying situation
resulted and a comparative morphological study was carried out between 16
different populations of N.jubbi, N.cyaneus
and their intermediary forms, originating from Kenya
and Somalia. Also a cytological study
of 5 populations was conducted. In addition, the behaviour of 16 and
reproduction of 7 different Somalia populations was studied. All the studied
populations showed very close similarities and could no longer be discriminated
and considered as different species. As conclusion, N.cyaneus
should therefore be considered as a synonym of N.jubbi.
Maintenance &
Breeding
N.cyaneus is
probably one of the least wanted species of the genus. Until now, the species
has not shown to be particularly difficult to breed and to maintain, but this is
based on experiences from more experienced hobbyists.
Water hardness plays only a secondary role in the maintenance,
as in nature values ranging between 5 to 40 DH have been observed. Analysis of
stomach contents did show that the natural diet mainly consisted in copepods,
waterfleas, but also mosquito larvae. In order to attain proper grow and good
health conditions, it is advised to use clean soft and, some breeder even
recommend slightly acidic, water. These fishes grow rather rapidly and are very
active which implies that regular partial water changes will be absolutely
necessary. Water pollution must be avoided at all costs and the water
temperature should preferably range between 23 and 27°C. It is also advised to
add salt [1 teaspoon of kitchen salt per 5 or 10 litres of tank water] as
preventive measure against velvet [Oödinium].
Reproduction of the species can be achieved by using 1 male
and from 2 to several females in a small and simply arranged aquarium. In order
to improve on productivity, it is advised to breed with several trios in a
slightly larger aquarium. In case the humid peatmoss containing the eggs is
stored at 20-22°C, the incubation period will be between 6 weeks and 3 months.
During this period, one can regularly inspect the eggs for "eyed-up"
embryos. During one of the water immersions, the hatching rate will be larger,
but one will have to re-dry the peatmoss containing the non-eyed-up eggs and
check for them once per month. Once sufficient peat bags have been collected,
one can hatch eggs nearly every month and, in doing so, one can have at one's
disposal, adults and fingerlings the whole year round.
Young fish grow very rapidly and, with frequent water changes
and plenty of food at their disposal, they can reach sexual maturity after only
5-6 weeks. They are particularly active and always on the move looking for food
or for a partner.
Water temperatures will best be kept around 22°
C., as otherwise the fish becomes sensitive to velvet (Oödinium). Ideal
would be a temperature of 24° -26°
C. pH values are best kept somewhat higher than the neutral point. A few couples
of the species can be kept in a medium sized tank, provided one secures for
females and secondary males many shelter opportunities. To this end, plenty of
vegetation and several pieces of peat fiber are already enough. Filtering the
water is not absolutely necessary when it is being regularly and partially
changed. They require rich feeding, comprising all sorts of mosquito larvae and
worms. Daphnia are not eagerly
taken whilst Cyclops seem to
enhance general body coloration and egg ripening.
For reproduction, a 20-30-l tank with a 2-3 cm thick peatmoss
layer is already enough. A trio can easily be maintained for spawning during 1-2
weeks in such a tank. Every 2 weeks, the peatmoss is removed and replaced with
new one. Peatmoss containing eggs is slightly pressed and left to dry for one to
two days on kitchen-roll paper until the outer layer takes a light brown colour.
The development time for the eggs depends on several factors. Eggs of wild
caught and F-1 specimens can already be developed after only 6 weeks, if they
are being kept at temperatures ranging between 25°
-30° C. At similar temperatures the
development time is usually around 10-12 weeks. Eggs preserved in relatively dry
peatmoss will develop faster than those kept in more wet peat. Hatching the eggs
happens in soft water of about 15°-18°C. Fry will usually hatch all together
such that a second drying period is often not necessary.
The fry can handle freshly hatched Artemia
nauplii, later Cyclops and Grindal
worms. The species is very productive, producing many eggs and fry. These will
thus have to be transferred to larger tanks. A regular and partial water change
is required. At an age of 4-6 weeks the young have reached sexual maturity.
Keeping sexes separated from this moment onwards is often recommended, unless
males are kept without females.
Literature