|
Performance of Duty The word karma refers to any action that results in a reaction, whether it be good or bad. The word Mimamsa means to analyze and understand thoroughly. The philosophical systems of karma-mimamsa and vedanta are closely related to each other and are in some ways complimentary. Karma-mimamsa may be understood as a stepping stone to vedanta. It examines the teachings of the Veda in the light of karma-kanda rituals, whereas vedanta examines the same teachings in the light of transcendental knowledge. The karma-mimamsa system is called purva-mimamsa, which means the earlier study of the Veda, and vedanta is called uttara-mimamsa, which means the later study of the Veda. Karma-mimamsa is to be taken up by householders, and vedanta is reserved for wise men who have graduated from household life and taken up the renounced order (sannyasa). The main goal of the karma-mimamsa philosophy is to provide a practical methodology for the utilization of the Vedic religion (dharma) for the satisfaction of the urges for wealth (artha) and sensual pleasure (kama). In so doing, karma-mimamsa provides a materialistic explanation of the Vedic rituals for persons whose material desires have blinded them to spiritual understanding. In the Veda, numerous gods and goddesses are invoked. The karma-mimamsa system interprets these deities and their worship in terms of a highly "human-centered" rather than "God-centered" rationale. The karma-mimamsa system also discusses the science of sound and the science of mantra, but the major concern of this system is to combine the self-discipline established by the yoga system (discussed previously) with the ritualistic portion of the Vedas. The aim of all this is to situate the selfish and skeptical human being in a mode of dutiful subordination to the Vedic injunctions in order to prepare him for further advancement as taught in the vedanta system. Therefore karma-mimamsa presents the Vedic religion as a science of mechanistic principles, and not as a faith of adoration of divinities aimed at receiving benedictions from on high. The Vedic dharma is justified to materialists as being "useful to humanity" in that it can satisfy human worldly desires in this life and in the next when properly executed. And proper execution of Vedic dharma requires karma-yoga, or selfless adherence to duty. The first systematic work on this school of Vedic thought is the Mimamsa-sutra
of Jaimini, which is divided into twelve chapters. Sabara Swami wrote a
major commentary on the Mimamsa-sutra, and many other commentaries
and independent works on this philosophy exist. Kumarila Bhatta and Prabhakara,
the revivalists of this system in post-Buddhist India, founded two branches
of karma-mimamsa (the major teachings of these branches are the
same).
The Concept of Duty
The term dharma is variously translated as "virtue," "duty," "morality," "righteousness," or "religion," but no single English word conveys the whole meaning of dharma. According to the karma-mimamsa system, dharma is the intrinsic nature of rta, the breath of cosmic life. One who wants to breathe and live properly is not supposed to disturb the breath of cosmic life. Disturbing other living beings disturbs the rhythm of the cosmic breath, and that is called adharma. The performing of dharma establishes peace and harmony in the breath of cosmic life. All those activities that coordinate one's individual life with universal life constitute one's duty or dharma. These activities are prescribed in the Vedic scriptures. There is always a hierarchy in one's duties. Everywhere and at every
moment a human being is faced with some kind of duty, and one has to be
very discriminating to understand the appropriate duty that is to be performed
at a particular time and place. One's scripturally authorized role in life
provides the key to knowing one's primary duty. For example, under the
codes of Vedic dharma it is the highest duty of a mother to take
care of her child. The highest duty of a teacher is to teach, that of a
student is to study, and that of a doctor is to take care of his patients.
Karma-mimamsa
proclaims that the Vedic rituals are the highest duties a brahmana
has to perform. The science of Vedic rituals is handed down by ancient
sages, who hid its methodology in arcane language that is understandable
only to the initiate. The efficacy of this science is determined by the
subtleties of the time, place and circumstance of the performance of the
rituals, and especially by the brahminical qualifications of the performer
of the rituals. Therefore entrance into the practice science depends completely
upon the sanction of higher authorities.
Ritual Duty and Philosophy
In the karma-mimamsa concept, rituals are performed not to worship
or please any deity but rather simply because the Veda commands
one to perform them. Thus, rituals are practiced for the sake of duty.
Food is cooked and through the use of mantras, the Cosmic Deity
(mahapurusa) in whom the demigods and all beings dwell is invited
to partake of the food and grant blessings in return. But the offering
is not made as an act of devotion. Rather, the karma-mimamsaka believes
the mahapurusa is obliged by the ritual to accept the offering and
give benedictions. Mastery of the ritual is mastery over the powers of
the universe. By proper execution of ritual, the performer expects to enjoy
prosperity on earth and be promoted to heaven (higher planets within this
universe where the standard of sensual happiness is much superior to earth).
The karma-mimamsa system teaches that one can cut one's own poisonous
plant of past bad karma with the powerful ax of present good karma
in the form of the performance of Vedic rituals.
The Karma-mimamsa Analysis of the Veda
The Science of Mantra
Karma-mimamsa does not study sound only at its articulated level but explores the subtle levels of sound by delving into its origin and realizing its various vibrational patterns. Sound is called vak in Sanskrit, but this word cannot be translated merely as "sound", or "speech." Vak refers to both thought and expression, while speech is the communication of thoughts and feelings through spoken words. Vak shakti, the power of speech, is actually a law of communication that is responsible for conveying thoughts and concepts, both individually and collectively. When one talks with someone else, the law of communication (vak shakti) is already present before one speaks and after one has spoken. Vak shakti is the force flowing from a higher level of consciousness through the articulated level of speech, which is its gross expression. Karma-mimamsa categorizes vak shakti at four levels: para, (transcendent), pasyanti (concentrated thought pattern), madhyama (formulated through thought patterns ready for expression), and vaikhari (expression with the help of words). According to karma-mimamsa there are two universally intertwined factors in manifestation: sabda, the sound; and artha, the object denoted by that sound. One signifies the name, and the other signifies the form. They are inseparably associated; there can be no sabda without artha, no artha without sabda. Together, they are the self-existent reality which is not subject to change, death, and decay. As they manifest, a double line of creation -- words and objects -- is formed. External sound, sensed by hearing, is of two types: sound with meaning and sound without meaning. Sound with meaning consists of the phonemes and words that make up language, but sound without meaning is not formulated into words and is not recognized as an element of communication. According to karma-mimamsa, external sound is transient, but it is also a manifestation of the eternal sound in akasa (ether). The nyaya school does not accept the mimamsa theory of sound; it holds that words are transitory in every regard. Karma-mimamsa counters that the perception of sound that begins when vibrating air contacts the ear drums must be distinguished from the sound itself. For sound to exist, one object must contact another and that is an external event. But the karma-mimamsa theory of sound with meaning goes beyond this, including also the internal mental movement of ideas that seeks outward expression through audible sound in phonemes, letters, words, and sentences. Thus the perception of sound is transient, but sound itself is eternal. The moment at which sound can be perceived is not the same moment at which it is produced; sound is manifested prior to being audible. The finest state of sound, called para vak, is perfect. The karma-mimamsa philosophy holds the eternal para vak to be the cause of all causes. [In Gaudiya Vaisnava philosophy, this para vak is the sound of Maha Vishnu's breathing, which precedes the appearance of the universe.] Any vibration that can be perceived by physical instruments such as the ears is only a gross manifestation; physical sound is inadequate for attainment of the ultimate state of consciousness signified by para vak. The next phase of sound is called pasyanti vak. There is only a slight difference between the state of para and that of pasyanti. Both are transcendental, but in pasyanti, the subtle form of the universe is "seen" within sound as the primeval artha, or object of desire. The word pasyanti means "one who sees." [Note: prior to his act of creation, Lord Brahma sees the subtle universal form after meditating upon the divine sound "tapa tapa."] In this state the power of desire still remains dormant, but it is nonetheless the direct cause of the universe, which will be manifested as both idea and speech. This language of silence is a universal language; it is the source of all language and speech. The third state of vak is called madhyama, meaning "that which is intermediate." This state of speech is neither transcendent, as in pasyanti, nor completely manifest, as is vaikhari (the grossest state of sound); it is between these two stages. Finally, the fourth state of speech is completely manifest and audible. At this stage, a sound that belongs to a specific language can be perceived through the sense of hearing. This state of sound is always accompanied by geographical, cultural and social diversities and distinctions that form different languages composed of articulated and distinguishable sounds. The origin of speech is transcendent and eternal, and the flow of pasyanti, madhyama and vaikhari from the state of para is also the flow of the forceful stream of energy from vak shakti. Like a river hidden in the mountains that comes gurgling forth as it rushes to the valleys where streams merge with it and the flows on to the plains before dissolving its identity into the ocean, similarly similarly speech emerges from its hidden source in the state of silence (para), flows downward into more and more manifested stages, and then at last dissolves into infinity, its origin. This is the process of the unfoldment and enfoldment of vak shakti. All speech that passes through the human mind becomes contaminated with the limitations of time, space, and causation. The ultimate truth is therefore veiled in everyday speech, but this is not the case with mantras. Mantras are not mere words but are specific sound vibrations that have been experienced by sages in the deepest state of meditation. They are said to be the sound-bodies of certain aspects of the cosmic forces. A mantra is therefore referred to as a setu, a bridge, that the student can use to cross over the mire of delusion and reach the other shore of the Absolute Truth. Mantras are capable of lighting in every human heart the eternal lamp of knowledge that does not flicker with the severe winds of worldly charms and temptations. The potential of a mantra lies in a dormant state until it is
awakened. The secret of awakening and utilizing mantras lies in
the rhythmic vibrations in which the mantra is meant to be pronounced
and repeated. The proper use of mantras, with their prescribed rituals,
is designed to lead one to experience the bliss and happiness contained
within the mantra itself. The power of mantra and its awakening
can be explained by the following analogy: In the rainy season in some
tropical countries the humidity may be one hundred percent, but one cannot
quench his thirst with atmospheric water alone because it is not concentrated
in usable form. Likewise the great potential of mantras is hidden
and diffuse. One must therefore learn how to awaken, concentrate, and utilize
their potential.
The Karma-mimamsa Concept of Gods and Goddesses
Some critics of karma-mimamsa philosophy accuse the system of promoting polytheism. But there is an underlying unity. The mimamsakas believe in an all-pervading consciousness that manifests itself in different stages, each of which has a different form (deity) and sound vibration (mantra). Thus exists the apparent diversity of deities and mantras to represent the unitary consciousness. The process of manifestation begins with the emergence of the most subtle forms, from which the grosser or more delineated forms are then manifested. This process has been described and in various ways in different scriptures. In the Vedic tradition, prototypic entities are invoked as deities -- demigods and demigoddesses -- each characterized by a particular set of superhuman qualities. The Vedic demigods radiate from the source of energy that generates all forms and names. Karma-mimamsakas see them as thought-forms that represent the cosmic powers. Karma-mimamsa philosophy does not conceive of the demigods as being identical to particular physical forms. If they were physically embodied, it would not be possibly for a single deity to be present at many different rituals being performed in different places at the same time. Yet it would not be correct to conclude that karma-mimamsakas think the forms of the demigods are imaginary. In this philosophy the deities emerge as primal forms and sound-bodies (mantras) endowed with perfect bliss and happiness beyond all mundane experiences. Though it seems that deity and mantra are two distinct principles operating on two different levels, in reality they are one and the same. A deity is a gross physical form of a mantra, and a mantra is a subtle form of a deity. When the sequence of vibration of a mantra is materialized into a particular form or shape, that is called a deity. Likewise, a materialized form can be dematerialized and reduced to certain frequencies of vibration that will be heard as a mantra. There are certain rules by which a mantra converts into a deity
and a deity converts into mantra. Both deities and
mantras
operate on a principle similar to the conversion of energy into matter
and matter into energy in physics. Wherever a particular ritual is performed
with the proper utilization of mantras, the deity related to those
mantras
is present because when the vibration is concentrated, the materialized
form of the deity appears. According to the karma-mimamsa system,
the vision of a deity does not therefore depend on the grace of that deity.
Rather, the deity, or form, is manifested wherever the mantra related
to it is pronounced in a prescribed manner, and it then has to yield the
desired objects that are believed to be provided by it. The karma-mimamsa
system does not rely on the grace of God for attaining worldly things or
achieving liberation. Adepts of karma-mimamsa philosophy have full
confidence that the cosmic powers can be utilized at will by proper execution
of ritual. Karma-mimamsa identifies two purposes of ritual: to attain
and expand one's own inner potential and unite it with the cosmic force,
and to pay respect and show gratitude to the cosmic forces that are constantly
supplying light and life to all sentient beings. This is considered to
be one of the foremost duties of human beings and should be an inseparable
part of everyone's life.
The Physical is Divine
The Sources of Valid Knowledge
Postulation (arthhapatti) is the necessary supposition of an
unperceived fact to explain some apparently conflicting phenomena. For
example, a person who does not eat during the day but constantly grows
fat can be suspected of eating at night. One cannot solve the contradiction
between fasting and growing fat unless he assumes that the person eats
at night. Knowledge of the person eating at night cannot come under the
category of perception or inference, nor can it be reduced to testimony
or comparison. Nonperception (anupalabdhi) is the source of one's
immediate cognition of nonexisting things. One can know the nonexistence
of a thing by the absence of its cognition, that is, if it is not present
in the senses and it cannot be understood by any other source of valid
knowledge. For instance, one can feel the absence of a jar that does not
exist because it is not perceived by the senses, but one cannot say that
the nonexistence of a jar is inferred by its nonperception, because an
inference is based on the universals relationship between middle and major
terms. And in this case there is no universal relationship between nonperception
(middle term) and the nonexistence of a jar (major term). Therefore direct
knowledge of the nonexistence of a jar can be explained only if non perception
is recognized as a separate and independent source of knowledge.
The Concept of Soul
|