The present diagram seems to be one of most interesting until to now seen. Why?.

So that, I dedicate myself with so much interest to the study of this diagram. Apparently he seems to be representative a little for he as concern the phenomenons of collapse in general. But the things is put in way rather various. He fo r first thing springs immediately to the eye the fact that the created wave and that we here see result widen of approximately three times. This occurrence show a high tied redshift to this. That means that the object or the objects in question are situ ated more than the half of the radius of the universe. The phenomenon for the moment presents itself isolated, he is canned then it study with much accuracy. His appearance is a distorted few, also this occurrence denotes a considerable distance from us , since the distorsion like I have told in precedence he is due to the motions in every direction of the space ether; being this of variable density, he results variable also his index of refraction. (I Do present that the index of refraction of the spac e ether is directly proportional to his constant dielectric,) you for the moment take this affirmation for good; we in succession will discuss some. Contrary to I as thought, in the first analysis on the first collapses, the phenomenon that I observe in t his case I hurt see that rather than begin with a collapse, the all begins with an entry of matter in that point of the universe, succession then by two collapses that to superimpose one over the other. But is this a sane thing or is he imagination? Fir st of all all observes that the mass that has entered is about around some in hundreds of billion of solar masses, this value deduces by the measure of the area on the diagram it. Now I say, like he is possible that the where he before was not seen nothi ng, I in the period of three or four days am existing so much matter and as much space. You won't think that I have materialized like by chance; this matter from any side too come. For the laws of the clamp gravitational, for produce a such clamp they w ould need hundreds of million of years. I don't think that there is anyone that I have the magic wand, and I cause certain phenomenon. We go instead to see in detail me to thing to presuppose has happened. The figure 6 show in clear way like the things are, at least for me; I for you don't know.

 

Figure 6. You in this diagram are observed like I have already told an isolated phenomenon. This is a real fortune. The whole he has a duration that goes from the half of June 95 to the first days of September, for a total of around 80 da ys. Like you could see the wave he is very detailed. To half June the phenomenon begins with a little descent, index of an expansion of matter. Then he suddenly seems to have an afterthought, he aims to go up, (you see white circle with the n 1), but h e halts immediately. Then form a small humped and he takes back to descend more rapidly than before. What could he be happened? Like we have more told times a drop of the wave, he indicates an expansion or an entry of matter in our universe. This sees it because I see raise the constant dielectric. As soon as this additional matter presents itself, he reverts on the collapsed quasar, that begins a phase of general collapse. he is since remember that we in this moment are taking up in examination the humped n 1. Immediately this beginning of collapse creates a rarefaction of space that attracts subsequent matter in entry. He at this point could proceed the phase of entry up to the end, and the 20 July begins the phase of collapse, with to the begin ning a small uncertainty. (you See circle white n 2.) The phase of collapse, rather than have her habitual figure to fork, this time show three peaks. The first of which he is decidedly pointed, (you see N circle 3), while the others two they present t hemselves rounded you see N circle 4.) In this circumstance the two quasar must be enough near, or if more distant, the second must be position in our line of see and toward of us. Too examining the events of the first months of the 94 he is derived tha t these quasar is not distant more of a month light the one from the other. And you look as if when in a cluster of these objects, one of these collapse, ago by detonator for the others that I am him near, up to the exhaustion of the most massive. In thi s circumstance all has gone for the toward correct, since they of near and massive quasar were only two; for the moment. You notice additionally like the height of the two superposed peaks as is equal among them. Therefore you observe all right the poin ts 1 2 3 4. I don't claim that you understand in short time, I am two years that I study us above. We see now great way, to as the redshift of these objects could amount. Doing a comparison with the old observations, I see on the average a widening of the wave of approximately 3 times and a height lower average of approximately 6 times. Now if I do the report between the 6 and the 3, and I do the square root of it, I find a value of distance of the last event of 1.4 times better than the events happen ed in the first months of the 94. At this point however I must assign the events de 94 a discrete redshift, I otherwise could not legitimate the redshift of this last event. then the whole you take yourself off still an a little. I think that he will ne ed wait for future events for have of the more exact data. An other occurrence that causes the leaving of these phenomenons, to be in his rarity. Considering the actual state of velocity of expansion of the universe, the first phenomenons should be pos itions to a distance of the visible radius, of around half or more a little. While he last to approximately three quarters of the visible radius. When I say visible radius of the universe I also indicate that this is the maximum radius, after which we don't can or more see nothing. Now does he come spontaneous wonder, as time has employed this signal for arrive at up to us? With the existence of the space ether, the distances, the redshifts and the times used by the signals for arrive to us, they coul d not be calculated with the old methods, because all has changed almost. The above mentioned time used to arrive at to the instrument, he amount around the 30 billion of years. While you for the signals of the waves arrive at the beginning of the 94, the time amounts around the 13 billion of years. For calculate the redshift and of consequence the velocity of leaving of the object, I use the formula Z=(C/ (C-V))- 1, he follows some that the velocity of leaving will be: V=C*Z/(Z+1). For you as concer n the calculus of the time used by the wave for arrive to the instrument, use an algorithm which proceeds for next approximations and he halts when I have extracted at least 12 decimal precise. This algorithm too helps to test the accuracy of it formula that calculates the redshift. The above mentioned formula of the redshift, he is valid for any distance of the body in examination. He doesn't need to do no adjustment. We return again to talk on that which he had happened in the first months of the 1994, for examine the problem of the detonation triggered by the first quasar of a group that to collapse, this phenomenon will see in an example brought again on the N figure it 8. We pass now to examine the figure 7.