ASL LE/2 Maglie - PRESIDIO OSPEDALIERO "F.FERRARI" - CASARANO (LE)

DIVISIONE DI CARDIOLOGIA UNITA' CORONARICA

Primario Dott. Giacinto PETTINATI

Home

telefoni
Personale 
Ambulatori
Convegni
Lavori scientifici
Guestbook
Link
tachicardia
News
insufficienza cardiaca
extrasistole
anatomia del cuore

 

AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD)

OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PHYLAX ICD

G. Pettinati – D. Melissano – F. De Santis – A. Marzo

Division of Cardiology “F. Ferrari” Hospital Casarano

ICD is by now a routine-practised therapy in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias to prevent sudden cardiac death. The objective of our prospective study was to evaluate the follow-up of patients implanted with Phylax ICDs.

METHODS

23 patients (20 male, 3 female, mean age 68 ± 6) enrolled in the study were affected by ischemic-dilated cardiomyopathy (11), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (7), valvular disease (2), pulmonary cardiomyopathy (3). All of them were in NYHA class 2-3, with an Ejection Fraction of 36 ± 13 %. Indications for ICD implantation were Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (18) and Ventricular Fibrillation (5). All the patients were implanted with the single-chamber model (19) or the dual chamber model (4) of the Biotronik Phylax ICD.

RESULTS

21/23 patients (91%) received ICD shocks which were appropriate and successful in 20/21 patients (95%). In 2 patients out of 23 the ICD delivered unsuccessful shocks causing device reprogramming (1) or replacement (1). ICD therapy deliveries were observed within 30 days and one year after implantation; more precisely: in 7 patients within 30 days, 5 within 3 months, 7 within 6 months, 2 within 1 year. In 2 patients ICDs still have not delivered any therapy. ICDs successfully terminated 4 episodes of Ventricular Fibrillation with shocks, 16 episodes of Ventricular Tachycardia with Anti-Tachy-Pacing (ATP) therapies (12 episodes) and with ATP+shocks (4 episodes). During a follow-up period of 18 months 3/23 patients (13%) died due to progressive and refractory congestive heart failure: in all these cases the ICD successfully delivered therapies after implant. In one patient “Arrhythmic Storm” was observed causing 51 maximal shock deliveries in 24 hours: all of them were appropriate and effective. This patient is still alive and in a good clinical condition. The total number of shocks delivered is 127, with a mean number of shocks per patient of 5,5.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and pump insufficiency remarkably benefit from the ICD therapy. In our patients the ICD implantation allowed a 18-months arrhythmic death survival of 87%. Phylax ICDs showed to be reliable and safe, with appropriate and successful therapy deliveries in 95% of cases.

- MESPE - Mediterranean Society of Pacing and Electrophisiology, Vol. 3, n.3 July-September 2001

 

cardiologiacasarano@tiscali.it